J. T. Glover ([info]jtglover) wrote,
@ 2008-07-01 07:30:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: mellow
Entry tags:marketing, reading, spec fic, writing

Gender-Imbalanced Cavemen
Neil Clarke weighs in on Eclipse-gate, inspired by some decidedly unsavory comments that have been made on the matter. (Jonathan Strahan's lengthy reflective comment here.) Clarke's essay is good, and I was especially pleased by:

It's ironic that a forward-looking genre can sometimes be so rooted in its ways. "But you might scare away the readers!" Wake up. The readers are already leaving. Yes, you might upset a few die-hard white supremacists, but a publication that represents a more diverse body of people may just appeal to a more diverse body of people. You might actually attract more readers.


I think this captures the situation very well.1 The supposed death of short fiction is too often discussed, but short fiction's such a vanishingly small piece of the publishing pie that I see little margin in trying to hold onto Tried-And-True, especially if you have no stake in doing so.

The Weird Tales reboot is a good example. It threw me for a loop at first, as did their 85 Weirdest list. Some notable names of the old guard don't appear on it, which rather put me off at first, but once I "thought around the corner," I was fine with it. Weird Tales was, in its previous incarnation, Tried-And-Truing its way (back) to the grave, and I'm happy to see the new, paradigm-shifted version of WT going great guns.

As I've said previously, I am personally only interested in author diversity insofar as it leads to more Chinese lesbians a variety of good stories in anthologies or magazines.2 I'm not as personally invested in this as some new authors trying to break in, for obvious demographic reasons. That said, if we want to get all label-y about it, the writers who have most rocked my work in the last few years are a Japanese guy and a lesbian witch. Whether the goods are made by neanderthals, austrolopithici, or homines habiles, I want my cave to be populated with things of all sorts, from obsidian sacrificial knives to sabertooth skulls to woolly rhinoceros hides. Otherwise life would be too boring.


-------------------------------------------------------
1. Disclosure: I read and submit to both Clarkesworld and Weird Tales. O for the day when I am so famous that people will simply know my bibliography by heart, and I need not worry about disclosures because everyone everywhere will know exactly what I've written. On the other hand, perhaps I just worry too much.
2. With the obvious caveat that I can't read the same thing all the time and wouldn't want to if I could.



(2 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]orrin
2008-07-01 05:58 pm UTC (link)
I know that, should the opportunity to edit ever arrive on my doorstep, that I wouldn't consciously discriminate against anybody based on anything but the writing and the story. That said, I fear that I wouldn't consciously work to promote diversity as much as I ought to, either.

I think that people are absolutely right in saying that the burden should not be to choose stories based on gender or race or what-have-you, but to make sure that your market is open and inviting to diverse individuals.

On the subject of markets having personalities, I do definitely think that markets should (and do) have personalities, and I think that Neil Clarke's right in saying that it's the editor who shapes those personalities. The new Weird Tales is a good example. I think I came across as objecting to their 85 Weirdest list, but that's not really what I was intending to do. I was intending to say that, yeah, I was thinking that the personality of my writing and the personality of Weird Tales had diverged (maybe a long time ago) and that list was (for the most part) a good showcase of their new personality, and how it was different from mine.

One of the things that drives me completely insane is when a market puts in their guidelines that they "just want good stories." (As I've said before and as Nick Mamatas says at greater length.) Part of the reason is because saying that denies that personality that each market has, and should have.

Okay, now that this comment is fully as long as your post, I'll stop.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jtglover
2008-07-02 01:33 am UTC (link)
I'm a long-comments man myself, so I'm not bothered. :)

Agreed on personalities. I don't want the same thing out of one magazine or anthology as the other. That, frankly, is something I can get oodles of in the fantasy and science fiction area of B&N. Short stories can take risks and do cool things, whereas novels... lotsa market forces in play demanding More Of The Same.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(2 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…