| What I Learned at the Con, Part 5: Con Truth and Fiction |
[May. 12th, 2008|10:36 pm] |
Stinky people go to cons. Possibly true? I was there for three days, and I encountered not one hygiene-deficient person. The con ran on different tracks, admittedly, and I didn't spend any time among the gamers. Not to say gamers are inherently stinky, but the gaming room was a 24hr affair, so I could imagine it getting a little foul. I heard jokes about the fabled 5-3-1 rule, but encountered no evidence.
Cons are for geeks, nerds, and dorks. Semi-true. Plenty of geeks, both in the old-school sense and the more current "people who are deeply into their thing" sense. Some nerdiness was in evidence, which I feel moderately well-qualified to judge, being both an academic and a librarian. There were some bona fide dorks on hand, but what of it? I'll take a goofy love of SF any day over a goofy love of, say, football. It's worthy pointing out that a substantial proportion of people there looked like Joe Schmoe from the street who just happens to like SF.
Flesh on Parade. Hmmm. I counted a grand total of two women wearing anything substantially more revealing than what you see at the mall, not counting a couple of the costumes that displayed period-appropriate amounts of cleavage. A few corsets, but some of those were relatively modest as well. What I liked most about the clothes was the vast variety, from faux-Celtical folks to yer irony-via-Hot Topic t-shirts people.
Rampant, horrid sexism holds sway at cons! Nope. Maybe there are problems at some cons, or in specific situations, but I had my eye peeled and noticed little. Yes, there were some socially awkward attempts to impress women, and yes, occasional skeeviness. I defy you to go to a baseball, basketball, or football game and find less sexism there or at the after-parties. Ain't saying creepy shit doesn't happen, but dammit, it was better than society in general tends to be. I asked a couple women I met their opinion about the whole thing, and both opined that they thought it wasn't a factor these days, and that the SF community was generally very friendly and welcoming. No, maybe conversation with a random strange guy asking about sexism wasn't the most comfortable grounds for discussion, but they seemed straightforward.
The dealers will part you from your money. True. I went planning to buy little, and there was just a lot of cool stuff. Things that you have to locate from individual suppliers online and pay $8 s/h, just there for the buying. Next time I'll bring more $$$.
The parties are the best part of it. Maybe. I enjoyed the party I went to, but it wasn't the be-all, end-all of the con for me. I'm not an extrovert, and I got a lot more out of talking with people in small groups or one-on-one. My experience would have been different if I'd stayed at the hotel, I think, but that will have to wait for more money or a con where I have to travel in order to attend. Likewise, I don't have a host of con-cronies I'm used to seeing, nor was I meeting up with people from LJ, either of which would have made a difference.
You'll learn a lot about [X]. Yes and no. While I got many useful bits and pieces and made some contacts, what I learned by going was a fraction of what I learn from following blogs and online discussions. There's a real difference between meeting people online and in person, no doubt, but when it actually comes to learning things, well, if you can't go to a con, don't worry too much.
What I found useful was the depth of answers, from individuals and panels. I asked a question, for instance, about what the most useful worldbuilding tools were for writers, and the four members of the panel all said it came down to finding knowledgeable people or doing personal research -- riding horses yourself, v. reading a description. I'd expected something about Wikipedia or Google, but it ultimately came down to human resources.
And finally… I had a good time, which I think is the most important part. One writer there observed that you don't have to attend cons if you don't want to go. They're enjoyable in their way, but not critical to success as a writer. I enjoyed RavenCon, and I'll be going to more cons in the future, but that's because I enjoyed it, not because I think they're essential to succeed (at least at this point in my nascent career). It's just nice to be able to spend time with people who share your interests.
Tune in next time for RavenCon vs. ALA Annual, about what the geeks have on the librarians, and vice versa. |
|
|